What should this service address?
Repointing concerns mortar joints. It is different from rebuilding the chimney or working on the internal liner. Have the affected joints and bricks assessed before choosing a method.
A neat exterior does not establish internal flue condition or structural stability. Compare written findings, proposed work, retained components and any questions requiring a separate qualified assessment.
What should be clear in the proposal?
These are questions for an agreed job, not guaranteed inclusions. Use them to compare written proposals before choosing a route.
Swipe across the table to compare all columns →
| Proposal item | What to confirm | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Mortar findings | Which joints are affected and how their condition is described | Repointing addresses joints, not the whole structure |
| Brick findings | Which bricks or sections are damaged and whether they are replaced | Brick replacement is a separate line item to confirm |
| Proposed work | Whether the plan is repointing, brick work or a broader rebuild | Each option needs a different level of assessment |
| Retained components | Which existing masonry is kept as sound | Clear retained parts make estimates easier to compare |
| Access and exclusions | How the work area is reached and what is excluded | Exclusions show what still needs a separate decision |
| Internal and structural questions | Whether flue, liner or structural questions are referred out | Confirm the qualified scope instead of assuming inclusion. |
What helps the next conversation?
- Share the exact property address and known appliance or fuel.
- Previously noticed brick or mortar changes and any earlier repair findings.
- Use only safely accessible photos; do not climb, dismantle or test the system.
- Describe access limits and agree the actual visit scope and schedule.

